Click *H for Haydock Commentary. *Footnote for footnote etc.
Click any word in Latin Greek or Hebrew to activate the parser. Then click on the display to expand the parser.
* Footnotes
-
*
2_Paralipomenon
18:1
Now Josaphat was rich and very glorious, and was joined by affinity to Achab.
- A.M. 3107, A.C. 897.
*H And there passed three years without war between Syria and Israel.
Ver. 1. Israel, from the time when Benadad and Achab had made a league. C. xx. 34.
*H And in the third year, Josaphat, king of Juda, came down to the king of Israel.
Ver. 2. Josaphat. It is wonderful that a prince of so great piety, should be on terms of such strict friendship with a most wicked king. God did not approve of it; and the event was unfortunate. 2 Par. xx. 37. Achab received the king of Juda with extraordinary magnificence. ib. xviii. 2. It is thought that (C.) the latter had married his daughter, (Grot.) or rather (H.) he had taken Athalia for his son Joram. 2 Par. xviii. 1. T. M.
*H (And the king of Israel said to his servants: Know ye not that Ramoth Galaad is ours, and we neglect to take it out of the hand of the king of Syria?)
Ver. 3. Syria. Benadad had not restored it; either because he no longer regarded his treaty, or because the city had not been taken by his father. C.
*H And Josaphat said to the king of Israel: As I am, so art thou: my people and thy people are one: and my horsemen are thy horsemen. And Josaphat said to the king of Israel: Inquire, I beseech thee, this day the word of the Lord.
Ver. 5. One, in concord, (H.) and ready to march against the same enemy. — Lord. This was rather late, if (M.) the army was already receiving its pay under the walls of Samaria. Joseph. viii. 15. — God ought to have been consulted at first. M.
*H Then the king of Israel assembled the prophets, about four hundred men, and he said to them: Shall I go to Ramoth Galaad to fight, or shall I forbear? They answered: Go up, and the Lord will deliver it into the hand of the king.
Ver. 6. Men, probably the prophets of the groves, who had not gone to Carmel. C. xviii. 19. 22. C. — The recent slaughter had not deterred others from imitating the example of the false prophets. H.
*H And Josaphat said: Is there not here some prophet of the Lord, that we may inquire by him?
Ver. 7. Lord. Josaphat knew that these four hundred were addicted to idol worship, (H.) and suspected that they only flattered their king. Josephus.
*H And the king of Israel said to Josaphat. There is one man left, by whom we may inquire of the Lord; Micheas, the son of Jemla: but I hate him, for he doth not prophecy good to me, but evil. And Josaphat said: Speak not so, O king.
Ver. 8. One man. Perhaps Micheas alone resided at Samaria. Elias and his disciples were in the country. Josephus and some others think, (C.) that the son of Jemla had been cast into prison for what he had said to Achab, when he had dismissed the king of Syria. C. xx. 43. H. — Not so. Good advice should be followed, though it be not pleasant. M. — Josaphat justly suspected the schismatical false prophets. W.
*H Then the king of Israel called an eunuch, and said to him: Make haste, and bring hither Micheas, the son of Jemla.
Ver. 9. Eunuch. Heb. saris, denotes also "a servant;" or Achab might have purchased this stranger.
*H And the king of Israel, and Josaphat, king of Juda, sat each on his throne, clothed with royal robes, in a court, by the entrance of the gate of Samaria, and all the prophets prophesied before them.
Ver. 10. Court, or barn floor. They were in or near cities, that they might be so protected from the incursions of enemies, who strove to set the corn on fire. 1 K. xxiii. 1. Judg. xv. 5.
*H And Sedecias, the son of Chanaana, made himself horns of iron, and said: Thus saith the Lord: With these shalt thou push Syria, till thou destroy it.
Ver. 11. Push, "with the horn," ( κερατισεις; Sept.) and throw into the air, (M.) like a bull. C. — Nothing shall withstand thy power. The actions of Sedecias were of the same import as his words. H. — See Jer. xxvii. 2. and xxviii. 10. — Such horns were shewn to Zacharias; (i. 18.) as false prophets often do, like the true ones. W.
*H So he came to the king, and the king said to him: Micheas, shall we go to Ramoth Galaad to battle, or shall we forbear? He answered him: Go up, and prosper, and the Lord shall deliver it into the king's hands.
Ver. 15. Go up, &c. This was spoken ironically, and by way of jesting at the flattering speeches of the false prophets: and so the king understood it, as appears by his adjuring Micheas, in the following verse, to tell him the truth in the name of the Lord. Ch. — Micheas had only repeated their words, and by his accent and gestures (D.) might easily explain his meaning. H. — Similar examples of irony may be seen. C. xviii. 27, and Gen. iii. 22. C. — The prophet might also pray for success. But the king begged for a positive answer. W.
* Footnotes
-
*
Numbers
27:17
And may go out and in before them, and may lead them out, or bring them in: lest the people of the Lord be as sheep without a shepherd.
-
*
Matthew
9:36
And seeing the multitudes, he had compassion on them: because they were distressed, and lying like sheep that have no shepherd.
*H And he said: I saw all Israel scattered upon the hills, like sheep that have no shepherd; and the Lord said: These have no master: let every man of them return to his house in peace.
Ver. 17. No shepherd....no master, clearly intimated (M.) that the king should perish in the battle. Paral. reads: These have no masters. H.
*H And he added and said: Hear thou, therefore, the word of the Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne, and all the army of heaven standing by him on the right hand and on the left:
Ver. 19. He, Micheas, added, (M.) not fearing the king's displeasure, who seemed to regard his former denunciation as an effect of his ill-will. Hence he explains his vision more at large. God often conforms to our ideas, and even prejudices. The people were then accustomed to look upon him as a king, environed with his army of good and evil spirits; the one at his right-hand, to execute his designs of mercy, and the other at his left, to execute his judgments. Job (i. 6, 12.) speaks in the like manner. We know that God stands in need of no counsellors; (Rom. xi. 34.) and that the angels of satan have no place in heaven. Isai. xiv. 12. Apoc. xii. 9. Jude 6.
*H And the Lord said: Who shall deceive Achab, king of Israel, that he may go up, and fall at Ramoth Galaad? And one spoke words of this manner, and another otherwise.
Ver. 20. The Lord said, &c. God standeth not in need of any counsellor; nor are we suppose, that things pass in heaven in the manner here described: but this representation was made to the prophet, to be delivered by him in a manner adopted to the common ways and notions of men. Ch. S. Greg. Mor. ii. 21. &c. W. — God did not enable the king to discern the falsehood. Bellarm. ii. 13. Grat. Amis.
* Summa
*S Part 1, Ques 114, Article 1
[I, Q. 114, Art. 1]
Whether Men Are Assailed by the Demons?
Objection 1: It would seem that men are not assailed by the demons. For angels are sent by God to guard man. But demons are not sent by God: for the demons' intention is the loss of souls; whereas God's is the salvation of souls. Therefore demons are not deputed to assail man.
Obj. 2: Further, it is not a fair fight, for the weak to be set against the strong, and the ignorant against the astute. But men are weak and ignorant, whereas the demons are strong and astute. It is not therefore to be permitted by God, the author of all justice, that men should be assailed by demons.
Obj. 3: Further, the assaults of the flesh and the world are enough for man's exercise. But God permits His elect to be assailed that they may be exercised. Therefore there is no need for them to be assailed by the demons.
_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Eph. 6:12): "Our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against Principalities and Powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places."
_I answer that,_ Two things may be considered in the assault of the demons--the assault itself, and the ordering thereof. The assault itself is due to the malice of the demons, who through envy endeavor to hinder man's progress; and through pride usurp a semblance of Divine power, by deputing certain ministers to assail man, as the angels of God in their various offices minister to man's salvation. But the ordering of the assault is from God, Who knows how to make orderly use of evil by ordering it to good. On the other hand, in regard to the angels, both their guardianship and the ordering thereof are to be referred to God as their first author.
Reply Obj. 1: The wicked angels assail men in two ways. Firstly by instigating them to sin; and thus they are not sent by God to assail us, but are sometimes permitted to do so according to God's just judgments. But sometimes their assault is a punishment to man: and thus they are sent by God; as the lying spirit was sent to punish Achab, King of Israel, as is related in 3 Kings 22:20. For punishment is referred to God as its first author. Nevertheless the demons who are sent to punish, do so with an intention other than that for which they are sent; for they punish from hatred or envy; whereas they are sent by God on account of His justice.
Reply Obj. 2: In order that the conditions of the fight be not unequal, there is as regards man the promised recompense, to be gained principally through the grace of God, secondarily through the guardianship of the angels. Wherefore (4 Kings 6:16), Eliseus said to his servant: "Fear not, for there are more with us than with them."
Reply Obj. 3: The assault of the flesh and the world would suffice for the exercise of human weakness: but it does not suffice for the demon's malice, which makes use of both the above in assailing men. But by the Divine ordinance this tends to the glory of the elect. _______________________
SECOND
* Footnotes
-
*
Matthew
8:32
And he said to them: Go. But they going out went into the swine, and behold the whole herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea: and they perished in the waters.
-
*
Apocalypse
20:3
And he cast him into the bottomless pit and shut him up and set a seal upon him, that he should no more seduce the nations till the thousand years be finished. And after that, he must be loosed a little time.
*H And he said: I will go forth, and be a lying spirit, in the mouth of all his prophets. And the Lord said: Thou shalt deceive him, and shalt prevail: go forth, and do so.
Ver. 22. Go forth, and do so. This was not a command, but a permission; for God never ordaineth lies, though he often permitteth the lying spirit to deceive those who love not the truth. 2 Thessal. ii. 10. And in this sense it is said in the following verse, the Lord hath given a lying spirit in the mouth of all thy prophets. Ch. — What is translated in the imperative, denotes frequently what will come to pass, though it be displeasing to God. C. — He permits it, therefore, only by not exerting his power to prevent the execution. H. — The devils can do nothing without such a permission. Achab deserved to be deceived by the false prophets, as he would not hearken to a true one. S. Aug. con. Jul. v. 4. and q. 53. inter. 83.
* Summa
*S Part 3, Ques 172, Article 6
[II-II, Q. 172, Art. 6]
Whether the Prophets of the Demons Ever Foretell the Truth?
Objection 1: It would seem that the prophets of the demons never foretell the truth. For Ambrose [*Hilary the Deacon (Ambrosiaster) on 1 Cor. 12:3] says that "Every truth, by whomsoever spoken, is from the Holy Ghost." Now the prophets of the demons do not speak from the Holy Ghost, because "there is no concord between Christ and Belial [*'What concord hath Christ with Belial?']" (2 Cor. 6:15). Therefore it would seem that they never foretell the truth.
Obj. 2: Further, just as true prophets are inspired by the Spirit of truth, so the prophets of the demons are inspired by the spirit of untruth, according to 3 Kings 22:22, "I will go forth, and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets." Now the prophets inspired by the Holy Ghost never speak false, as stated above (Q. 111, A. 6). Therefore the prophets of the demons never speak truth.
Obj. 3: Further, it is said of the devil (John 8:44) that "when he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own, for the devil is a liar, and the father thereof," i.e. of lying. Now by inspiring his prophets, the devil speaks only of his own, for he is not appointed God's minister to declare the truth, since "light hath no fellowship with darkness [*Vulg.: 'What fellowship hath light with darkness?']" (2 Cor. 6:14). Therefore the prophets of the demons never foretell the truth.
_On the contrary,_ A gloss on Num. 22:14, says that "Balaam was a diviner, for he sometimes foreknew the future by help of the demons and the magic art." Now he foretold many true things, for instance that which is to be found in Num. 24:17: "A star shall rise out of Jacob, and a scepter shall spring up from Israel." Therefore even the prophets of the demons foretell the truth.
_I answer that,_ As the good is in relation to things, so is the true in relation to knowledge. Now in things it is impossible to find one that is wholly devoid of good. Wherefore it is also impossible for any knowledge to be wholly false, without some mixture of truth. Hence Bede says [*Comment. in Luc. xvii, 12; Cf. Augustine, QQ. Evang. ii, 40] that "no teaching is so false that it never mingles truth with falsehood." Hence the teaching of the demons, with which they instruct their prophets, contains some truths whereby it is rendered acceptable. For the intellect is led astray to falsehood by the semblance of truth, even as the will is seduced to evil by the semblance of goodness. Wherefore Chrysostom says [*Opus Imperf. in Matth., Hom. xix, falsely ascribed to St. John Chrysostom]: "The devil is allowed sometimes to speak true things, in order that his unwonted truthfulness may gain credit for his lie."
Reply Obj. 1: The prophets of the demons do not always speak from the demons' revelation, but sometimes by Divine inspiration. This was evidently the case with Balaam, of whom we read that the Lord spoke to him (Num. 22:12), though he was a prophet of the demons, because God makes use even of the wicked for the profit of the good. Hence He foretells certain truths even by the demons' prophets, both that the truth may be rendered more credible, since even its foes bear witness to it, and also in order that men, by believing such men, may be more easily led on to truth. Wherefore also the Sibyls foretold many true things about Christ.
Yet even when the demons' prophets are instructed by the demons, they foretell the truth, sometimes by virtue of their own nature, the author of which is the Holy Ghost, and sometimes by revelation of the good spirits, as Augustine declares (Gen. ad lit. xii, 19): so that even then this truth which the demons proclaim is from the Holy Ghost.
Reply Obj. 2: A true prophet is always inspired by the Spirit of truth, in Whom there is no falsehood, wherefore He never says what is not true; whereas a false prophet is not always instructed by the spirit of untruth, but sometimes even by the Spirit of truth. Even the very spirit of untruth sometimes declares true things, sometimes false, as stated above.
Reply Obj. 3: Those things are called the demons' own, which they have of themselves, namely lies and sins; while they have, not of themselves but of God, those things which belong to them by nature: and it is by virtue of their own nature that they sometimes foretell the truth, as stated above (ad 1). Moreover God makes use of them to make known the truth which is to be accomplished through them, by revealing Divine mysteries to them through the angels, as already stated (Gen. ad lit. xii, 19; I, Q. 109, A. 4, ad 1). _______________________
*H And Sedecias, the son of Chanaana, came, and struck Micheas on the cheek, and said: Hath then the spirit of the Lord left me, and spoken to thee?
Ver. 24. Cheek. Josephus says he had told the king, that if his hand did not wither, like that of Jeroboam, he might conclude that Micheas was a false prophet; particularly as his prediction was at variance with that of Elias; who had asserted that Achab should die at Jezrahel, while Micheas seemed to condemn him to death at Ramoth. But these circumstances are by no means certain, though they be adopted by the author of the Scholastic History, by Lyran, &c. C. — If Sedecias had the assurance to make such a declaration, God was not obliged to work a miracle to prevent the king's mistake; and Micheas had never said that Achab should die at Ramoth. H. — Hath. In 2 Par. xviii. 23, it is expressed, Which way went the spirit of the Lord from me to speak to thee? If he could have proved that he had ever possessed the spirit, he might have spoken with some confidence; though sin may easily banish him. Thus Catholics may ask the pretended reformers, who boast of the spirit, how He came to abandon the Church with which all agree He once resided, to establish a contrary one? The spirit of God cannot be at variance with himself, nor reveal contradictory things. H.
*H And Micheas said: Thou shalt see in the day when thou shalt go into a chamber within a chamber to hide thyself.
Ver. 25. Go into a chamber, &c. This happened when he heard the king was slain, and justly apprehended that he should be punished for his false prophecy; (Ch.) though this be nowhere recorded, (C.) except in Josephus. W. — He probably escaped death. Salien.
*H And tell them: Thus saith the king: Put this man in prison, and feed him with bread of affliction, and water of distress till I return in peace.
Ver. 27. Distress, both "in small quantity," (Paral.) and very bad. Grot. T. Isai. xxx. 20. — Peace, when I will punish thee, as an impostor. M. — How grating must this have been to the good king Josaphat; and still he does not abandon the company of such infatuated people! v. 29. H.
*H And the king of Israel said to Josaphat: Take thy armour, and go into the battle, and put on thy own garments. But the king of Israel changed his dress, and went into the battle.
Ver. 30. Thy own. Sept. "I will disguise myself, and go into the battle; and do thou put on my garment." Hence the Syrians mistook Josaphat for Achab, (v. 32. C.) as "it had been agreed between them, that he should wear the robes of Achab, to elude more easily the prediction of Micheas." Joseph. viii. 15. — Vain and impious attempt! Providence found him out, though unadorned. H. — Achab might pretend thus to honour the king of Juda! (M.) and perhaps he had been apprized of the order given to the Syrians, to single him out, v. 31. What could prompt such an order, cannot be easily ascertained. Benadad might wish to revenge himself, for being brought out as a prisoner to Achab; or he might be informed of the prediction of Micheas.
*H And the king of Syria had commanded the two and thirty captains of the chariots, saying: You shall not fight against any, small or great, but against the king of Israel only.
Ver. 31. Captains of, or mounted "on chariots." There would hardly be so many general officers over the chariots alone. The same number of kings had been in a former engagement, and they had been replaced by these captains. C. xx. 24. C. — Only. Not that the Syrians were to avoid hurting any body else, as they could not thus come at the king; (Salien) and we find one shot an arrow at the army of Israel; (v. 34. H.) but the main onset was to be directed against Achab, either to kill or to take him prisoner. M.
*H So when the captains of the chariots saw Josaphat, they suspected that he was the king of Israel, and making a violent assault, they fought against him: and Josaphat cried out.
Ver. 32. Cried out. Par. add, to the Lord, and he helped him, and turned them away from him. The Jews (in Seder. Olam xvii.) acknowledge the same thing; and thus it was known that Josaphat was not the king of Israel, who would rather have invoked Baal. M. — Perhaps he also declared the truth, and who he was, when he saw the Syrians surround him, crying, This is the king of Israel! 2 Par. xviii. 31. T.
*H And a certain man bent his bow, shooting at a venture, and chanced to strike the king of Israel, between the lungs and the stomach. But he said to the driver of his chariot: Turn thy hand, and carry me out of the army, for I am grievously wounded.
Ver. 34. Stomach. Par. between the neck and the shoulders. The arrow went in at the lungs, and came out at the shoulders, as it was shot from a lower ground. M. — Some explain the Heb. "between the joints and the coat of mail." Prot. "joints of the harness." Sept. "between the lungs and the thorax." H. — Syr. "between the juncture of the coat of mail," where it is connected with the armour of the thighs. Grot. — God directed the random shot. Salien. W. — Hand. It was deemed unbecoming for the king to touch the reins. Diod. Sic. xvii. Brisson iii. p. 383.
*H And the battle was fought that day, and the king of Israel stood in his chariot against the Syrians, and he died in the evening: and the blood ran out of the wound into the midst of the chariot.
Ver. 35. Evening. Achab had only retired to the hinder ranks, while Josaphat, by his valour, maintained the day, till the death of the former put an end to the war.
* Footnotes
- A.M. 3107.
*H And they washed his chariot in the pool of Samaria and the dogs licked up his blood, and they washed the reins according to the word of the Lord which he had spoken.
Ver. 38. Of Samaria. Josephus says, of Jezara, (Jezrahel) conformably to the prediction. But God had relented in that particular, on Achab's repentance; (C. C. xxi. 24. 29.) unless it regarded his son Joram. H. Salien. — Reins. Heb. zonoth, may also signify "arms," (Munster) and "harlots." Sept. Some suspect that such were painted on the chariot. Josephus intimates, with the Sept. that "harlots bathed in the blood," (Ant. viii. 15.) which would tend to the greater contempt of Achab. M. — Spoken, respecting dogs licking up Achab's blood. No mention had been made of the chariot. God was thus pleased to shew how easily he could have executed the sentence in all its rigour.
*H But the rest of the acts of Achab, and all that he did, and the house of ivory that he made, and all the cities that he built, are they not written in the book of the words of the days of the kings of Israel?
Ver. 39. Of ivory. The palace was greatly adorned with it, (see Amos iii. 15. and Ps. xliv. 9. C.) like the throne of Solomon. C. x. 18. Pliny (xvi. 43,) speaks of bedsteads and vehicles of ivory, in the same sense. T.
* Footnotes
- A.M. 3090, A.C. 914.
*H Nevertheless, he took not away the high places for as yet the people offered sacrifice, and burnt incense in the high places.
Ver. 44. He took not away, &c. He left some of the high places, viz. those in which they worshipped the true God: but took away all others, 2 Par. xvii. 6; (Ch.) and even those also, before the end of his reign; (C.) as they were contrary to the law. M. — Others think that the passage in Par. is incorrect; ula being substituted for vaud. He took away the high places, (C. xix. 3,) and the groves. Grot. Capell. — We know that such remained in the days of Joas; and Josaphat in not ranked among the irreproachable kings. Eccli. xlix. 5. C. — He attempted perhaps to remove those places, but was prevented by the people. M. See C. xv. 14.
*H And Josaphat had peace with the king of Israel.
Ver. 45. Israel. The five subsequent verses are omitted in the Roman Sept.
*H And the remnant also of the effeminate, who remained in the days of Asa, his father, he took out of the land.
Ver. 47. Effeminate. Men addicted to unnatural lust. C. xiv. 24. and xv. 12.
*H And there was then no king appointed in Edom.
Ver. 48. Edom. Heb. and Chal. "but a deputy king," or viceroy; (T.) so that the kings of Juda might equip fleets at Asiongaber, as the country of Idumea was subject to them ever since the time of David. 2 Par. viii. 17. Under Ochozias, the son of Josaphat, the kings of Edom became independent, 4 K. viii. 20. C. — Hitherto they had paid tribute. M.
* Footnotes
- A.M. 3108. ---
-
**
2_Paralipomenon
20:36
And he was partner with him in making ships, to go to Tharsis: and they made the ships in Asiongaber.
*H But king Josaphat made navies on the sea, to sail into Ophir for gold: but they could not go, for the ships were broken in Asiongaber.
Ver. 49. Made. Heb. incorrectly reads hasar, "ten," instead of hasa, "made;" (C.) which the Prot. follow, "made ships of Tharshish, to go to Ophir." H. See C. ix. 26. and 28.
*H Then Ochozias, the son of Achab, said to Josaphat: Let my servants go with thy servants in the ships. And Josaphat would not.
Ver. 50. Would not. He had been reprehended before for admitting such a partner: and therefore would have no more to do with him. Ch. — They had formerly joined in equipping such a fleet, (2 Par. xx. 36. and 37. C.) and it had been dashed to pieces in the very port. H.
* Footnotes
- A.M. 3115, A.C. 889.
* Footnotes
- A.M. 3106.
*H And Ochozias, the son of Achab, began to reign over Israel, in Samaria, in the seventeenth year of Josaphat, king of Juda, and he reigned over Israel two years.
Ver. 52. Years, not complete; as the first is comprized in the reign of Achab, and the last in that of Joram. 4 K. iii. 1. Usher, A. 3108. — Yet, his very short reign was memorable for many disasters; the revolt of the dependant king of Moab, the ruin of his navy, &c. that he might thus be reclaimed from his evil ways. Salien, A.C. 915. — Houbigant allows this king two full years; and rejects the notion of his being associated by his father, as he does on other similar occasions, where the Scripture is silent. He makes Ochozias commence in the 19th, and end in the 22d of Josaphat, and not in the second of Joram. 4 K. i. 17. The Heb. and Greek copies vary. H.